<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Substrakt &#187; Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://substrakt.co.uk/tag/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://substrakt.co.uk</link>
	<description>Substrakt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ASOS get social and get it right.</title>
		<link>http://substrakt.co.uk/2009/04/28/asos-get-social-and-get-it-right/</link>
		<comments>http://substrakt.co.uk/2009/04/28/asos-get-social-and-get-it-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.substrakt.co.uk/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ASOS have been making it big recently. I also noticed that their online efforts are second to none, at least in the fashion retail sector. I wagered, albeit with myself, that ticking all these online 'boxes' was, at least in part, reason for their great success.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-411" title="asos" src="http://www.substrakt.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/asos.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="357" /></p>
<p><a href="http://asos.com" target="_blank">ASOS</a> have been making it big recently. I also noticed that their online efforts are second to none, at least in the fashion retail sector. Their <a href="http://www.asos.com" target="_blank">website</a> is top-notch. Nearly all their items of clothing have a gallery of images and (impressively) a catwalk video to match. Their email newsletters are far more comprehensive than that of rivals Urban Outfitters or Topshop/Topman. Nearly all their employees keep an active commentary of fashion on <a href="http://wefollow.com/tag/asos" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. They&#8217;ve recently launched a community arm of their website called <a href="http://community.asos.com/" target="_blank">ASOS Life</a>.  I wagered, albeit with myself, that ticking all these online &#8216;boxes&#8217; was, at least in part, reason for their great success.  It may be a few months old, but I stumbled accross <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/shane_richmond/blog/2008/12/04/social_media_todo_list_2009" target="_blank">this article</a> today by <a href="http://www.ilanafox.co.uk/" target="_blank">Ilana Fox</a> (the Community Manager at ASOS), which seemed to confirm my thoughts. A section from it:</p>
<blockquote><p>Wherever you look there&#8217;s news of job cuts in the press. No newspaper group seems to be able to escape from it, so why are they <em>still</em> spending thousands and thousands of pounds launching social networks and new platforms for their users to talk to each other, when they&#8217;re not actually joining in with the conversation themselves?  We know the main reason is money, resource, time and effort. We all get that, and it doesn&#8217;t need to be spelled out. But could it also be that newspapers like to be the authority, and don&#8217;t want to put themselves in a position where that authority is questioned? Newspapers are facing a difficult future, and no matter what a few web-savvy commentators say, newspapers still don&#8217;t like &#8211; or get &#8211; the internet. They don&#8217;t want to have a conversation with their users. They want just want them to be readers, and to make sure their opinions are pigeon-holed carefully in selected areas of the brand. For them it&#8217;s not a real community &#8211; it&#8217;s an easy way to look like they want opinions, even if they don&#8217;t do anything with them.  But where&#8217;s the proof that their readers are influencing or helping to create the future of their newspaper brands? I&#8217;ve not seen evidence of it.  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so excited about what I&#8217;m doing at ASOS.com. We&#8217;ve not launched the community platform yet, but that hasn&#8217;t stopped us from talking to our community already &#8211; they were talking to each other anyway, and we&#8217;ve started to join in &#8211; on <a title="ASOS blogs" href="http://asosblog.typepad.com/community_news/" target="_blank">our blogs</a>, via <a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=logo#/pages/ASOS/10936503735" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, via <a title="ASOS_Ilana" href="http://twitter.com/ASOS_Ilana" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. We want to open up that conversation, and we genuinely want to get know our customers. What we&#8217;re launching is a way for our customers to talk to us directly and transparently, to talk to each other, and to help develop ASOS into something even better &#8211; something that they want.</p></blockquote>
<p>Full article: <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/shane_richmond/blog/2008/12/04/social_media_todo_list_2009" target="_blank">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/shane_richmond/blog/2008/12/04/social_media_todo_list_2009</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s really refreshing to see a company with the balls to engage in an open community and ultimately benifitting from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://substrakt.co.uk/2009/04/28/asos-get-social-and-get-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
